Child rights body issues summons over lack of standard testing methods to screen for presence of formaldehyde and asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s baby shampoo and talcum powder.
Child rights body issues summons over lack of standard testing methods to screen for presence of formaldehyde and asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s baby shampoo and talcum powder.
J&J loses in court, talcum powder linked to cancer
Johnson & Johnson reportedly hid presence of asbestos in baby powder - Vox
Johnson & Johnson says new tests find no asbestos in baby powder
J&J knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its Baby Powder
J&J knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its Baby Powder
Johnson & Johnson must pay $18.8m to cancer patient in baby powder lawsuit, Johnson & Johnson
Explained: Why has Johnson and Johnson decided to discontinue its talc-based baby powder?
Johnson & Johnson Feared Baby Powder's Possible Asbestos Link for Years - The New York Times
Now, a cancer-causing substance found in Johnson & Johnson's 'No More Tears' baby shampoo
Does baby powder cause cancer? Another jury says yes
Supreme Court Won't Consider Johnson & Johnson Challenge to Baby Powder Judgment - WSJ
Johnson & Johnson will stop selling talcum-based baby powder globally - CBS News
Cancer-Causing Formaldehyde Found In Johnson & Johnson Baby Shampoo: Official
Johnson & Johnson Responds To Recent News Coverage on Talc
J&J Recalls Baby Powder on Asbestos Concern - WSJ